Cardano Test Engineer · Team pilot

Prove the workflow on one representative repository.

A focused pilot turns the packaged system into a team-specific operating model. It measures whether the agent improves test completeness and review evidence without weakening engineering ownership.

Pilot sequence

Adoption based on evidence, not a blanket rollout

Step 1

Map one real repository

Review your validator boundaries, Lucid transaction builders, fixtures, CI, and recurring review comments.

Step 2

Configure the engineering system

Adapt playbook routing, source grounding, parity checks, test evidence, and stop conditions to your conventions.

Step 3

Run shadow-mode evaluations

Have engineers compare agent output with current review practice before granting broader repository access.

Step 4

Approve a controlled rollout

Document human review gates, prohibited actions, failure escalation, ownership, and the evidence required for acceptance.

Useful inputs

A representative Aiken + Lucid repository
Examples of accepted and rejected pull requests
Your current test and CI commands
Senior review conventions and known failure patterns
A technical owner who can approve the final gates

Expected outputs

Repository-specific routing and source constraints
Aiken/Lucid parity and evidence checks
Golden, failure-path, and stop-condition evaluations
A documented human review and escalation model
A rollout recommendation based on observed results

Choose a repository that represents the hard work.

Tell MiReVerse what it builds, who reviews it, and which mistakes cost the most time.

Plan the pilot